Executive Changes Abound at Disney Parks and Resorts

| January 10, 2013

As I’ve said many times, it’s amazing how a relatively quiet day can be suddenly blown up by the Disney news wire. Several Disney executives are being moved around effective February 1st. Read on after the break to find out who’s moving where and what it could mean for Walt Disney World.

Rumors have been floating around for a while about a possible executive shuffle. Some names changed, but the end result is the same. Here’s a breakdown of the executive changes:

  • Meg Crofton currently holds the title of President of Walt Disney Parks and Resorts Operations, U.S. and France as well as President of Walt Disney World. She will now drop her role as President of Walt Disney World.
  •  Current Disneyland President George Kalogridis will come to Florida to take over as President of the Walt Disney World Resort.
  • Michael Colglazier, current Vice President of Disney’s Animal Kingdom will move to President of the Disneyland Resort.
  • Tom Wolber, current Senior Vice President of Disney Cruise Line will move to Senior Vice President of Downtown Disney and Disney Sports.
  • Josh D’Amaro, current Vice President of Adventures by Disney will move to Vice President of Disney’s Animal Kingdom.
  • Claire Bilby, current Vice President of Disney Vacation Club, is moving to Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing Disneyland Paris and Europe.
  • Ken Potrock, current Senior Vice President of Downtown Disney and Disney Sports, will head Disney Vacation Club and Adventures By Disney.

As indicated in this news article, the change most people are talking about is the removal of Meg Crofton from President of Walt Disney World. With many parts of the resort suffering a decline in quality, she is largely disliked by the fan community. She doesn’t fare much better with cast members either. Cast member benefits have been cut back more and more each year under her leadership. That’s a story for another blog, but the point is that she’s not well liked.
By contrast, George Kalogridis has been President over Disneyland while Cars Land was being developed. Although some make the argument this was the result of being in the right place at the right time, he also lobbied for EPCOT to be the center of the Millennium celebration. Either way, there’s a large amount of hope out there that this will lead to a change in philosophies around the resort.

Another notable change comes at Downtown Disney as Tom Wolber, who oversaw the launching of two new ships at Disney Cruise Line, moves over to Downtown Disney and Disney Sports.  Splitsville has been a great addition to Downtown Disney, but anyone can see more needs to be done. We can only hope that fresh blood will continue to bring in new venues to the area.

Of course it’s important to keep expectations in check. Executives are a lot like quarterbacks: all the glory and all the blame. That said, it’s hard to see how this can be anything but positive for Walt Disney World. Most would agree it can’t be worse, so the only question left is HOW positive it will be for the resort.

As for Meg’s future in the company, she is expected to hold her new role for a while before heading off to retirement, cementing her legacy into the dark lore of WDW history.


Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Category: Adventures by Disney, Disney Cruise Line, Disney World, Disneyland, News

About the Author ()

  • mlpsjp

    I get that she was perhaps NOT a favorite, but what a rude article! You realize this is about a person, right?

  • Thommy Sandvick

    To what exactly are you referring? I didn’t comment on her character, I stated facts.
    Fact: CM benefits have declined since she has been in charge
    Fact: Several areas of the resort are suffering declining quality.
    Fact: She is not well liked by the fan community

    How exactly was I rude to her, and by extension, how was I rude to her as a person?

  • future84

    Thommy, you are right, I didn’t read anything rude. Now if Pete had written it, anything (nice or not) would have been perceived as sarcastic. But your tone came across as informed.

du-sidebar-show-notes
du-sidebar-show-notes
du-sidebar-show-notes

du-sidebar-show-notes
du-sidebar-show-notes du-sidebar-show-notes du-sidebar-show-notes du-sidebar-show-notes